| 
			
				|  |  
				
		No. 26 - 
				12 Angry Men (1957)Orion-Nova Productions, United Artists
 LIFE IS IN THEIR HANDS - 
		DEATH IS ON THEIR MINDS!
 |  |  
				
				
				12 Angry Men (1957)  
				DML Rating: 
				★★★★★★★★★★ 
				- perfect Director: Sidney Lumet; 
		Screenplay: Reginald Rose; based on the novel by Reginald 
		Rose; 
		Rated: Approved Starring: Henry Fonda, Lee J. Cobb, 
		Jack Warden, Jack Klugman, Martin Balsam, John Fiedler, E. G. Marshall, 
		Edward Binns, Joseph Sweeney, Ed Begley, George Voskevec, Robert Webber
		 Movie Introduction: Following the closing arguments in 
		a murder trial, the 12 members of the jury must deliberate, with a 
		guilty verdict meaning a death sentence for the accused, an inner-city teen 
		boy. As the 
		dozen men try to reach a unanimous decision while sequestered in a 
		closed room, eleven vote guilty, however one juror #8 (Fonda) casts a 
		not guilty vote. He still has doubts on 
		the facts presented in the case. Outside distractions, personal issues, 
		even bigotry, soon 
		rise to the surface, and these conflicts threatens to derail the delicate 
		process that will decide the boy's fate.  
		 
		 Defining Moment: 
		the bigot - juror #10 If you have a pulse at all, you 
		realize that bigots are among us. They are on Facebook, Twitter, TikTok. 
		They are at work, in stores, on the news. Some are quite. Most are vocal.  
		They're all looking for an audience. In this film, when the bigot is exposed, he 
		becomes a beaten work completely without any power or influence.     
		Something subtle you might have missed:  it's going to be 
		alright At the end of the film, the 
		exhausted jurors exit 
		the room to return to their lives. The last two, jurors #3 (Fonda) and #8 (Cobb), remain. These 
		very different men have gone at each other all day. Juror #3, a 
		passionate man, carrying suppressed anger towards his unappreciative 
		son, sits with this head down, ashamed of his explosive conduct. Juror #8, 
		a rational man who stayed cool and served as the jury's voice of reason, walks over to the coat rack and 
		takes down a jacket. He walks over and drapes it on Juror #3's shoulders 
		with a gentle pat. 
		This simple, kind gesture melts my heart every time. It is a small, but meaningful, 
		olive branch. There's a small pleasant exchange, then the two jurors 
		exit the deliberation room, 
		returning to normal, having performed their duty to our country's 
		justice system.    Memorable Quotes: 
		 "What's the matter with you 
		guys? You all know he's guilty! He's got to burn! You're letting him 
		slip through our fingers!" - Juror #3 "You don’t really mean that you 
		would kill me, do you?" Juror #8 Dad's Review: The medium of film never ceases 
		to amaze me. This film takes place almost exclusively in 
		one room. How could that possibly be interesting or even captivating?  Yet, it is. 
		 We learn about the jury process - a chance to witness exactly how a great stalwart of America’s justice system, the 
		jury, works. America’s judicial process really is unique. Twelve people 
		must hear all the data related to a case: the details, the plaintiff, 
		the accused, the attorneys, the witnesses, the judge, the facts, the 
		truth, the lies…and eventually, each juror must cast a vote for either 
		innocent or guilty.  The jurors in this picture 
		feature various types of people, in this case all men. We are presented with:
		 Juror #1 – Assistant football 
		coach - Willing to assume the leadership role, but not actually a capable 
		leader.  Juror #2 – Bank worker - Meek 
		and used to being talked over, always acquiescing and overlooked. Juror #3 – Courier business 
		owner - Hot tempered, type-A 
		personality, having issues with his own son, whose attitudes resemble the accused. Juror #4 – Stock 
		broker - Analytical, confident, rational and calm. Juror #5 – Regular guy with 
		simple aspirations who 
		grew up in a tough neighborhood and loves the Baltimore Orioles Juror #6 – House painter - Tough, but 
		principled. Juror #7 – Salesman - Indifferent, 
		wise-cracking, could care less about being there, hates "missing the 
		game". Juror #8 – Architect - 
		Thoughtful, takes this duty seriously and honestly wants to reach a fair 
		verdict. Juror #9 – Retired senior citizen 
		- Wise, intelligent and observant, but often disregarded because of 
		his age. Juror #10 – Garage owner- Pushy, loud, not a good listener; he talks at people, not to them. Juror #11 – European watchmaker 
		- Polite, naturalized 
		citizen who feels a sense of patriotism and appreciates the American legal 
		system. Juror #12 – Ad executive - Indecisive, easily swayed and doesn’t want to offend anyone. When you see this 
		film, you might ask yourself, "Which juror am I?" You might see a 
		part of yourself in one person, or perhaps in several.  I love films that make you think. When the jurors cast the 
		first vote, it is eleven to one for guilty. One man stands alone - Juror 
		#8. Standing alone used to be a quintessential American trait - courage 
		is to stand for what is right, 
		no matter what. Society depends on it. However, there can be no 
		reasonable doubt" in a murder case - the votes must be unanimous.  Juror #8 initially asserts that he 
		is just sure. He just feels that it's important enough to discuss the case’s 
		facts further. A boy's life is at stake, so they should get it right. Some jurors find this 
		delay annoying because they have places to be. 
		 After some discussion, another 
		vote is taken. Now, there are two votes for not guilty. This causes the 
		discussions to get more and more heated. Emotions erupt. People are 
		forced to back the reasons for their votes. It is incredible to watch. Henry Fonda, 
		as the conscientious, calm Juror #8, gives one of his best performances. By this point in his career he was a seasoned veteran, able to 
		give his role the necessary nuances. It would have been so easy to try 
		and be the heroic man who takes over and leads, but his performance 
		is extremely restrained and methodical.  Juror #8 is not there to prove he’s right, 
		yet 
		that is the end result. He uses simple logic and pointed questions to 
		prove "reasonable doubt" to sway the indecisive jurors. This also exposes character flaws in 
		some of the 
		others. He delivers this performance as the simple "every man": mild, 
		intelligent, strong, driven by convictions. This was Henry Fonda's 
		super-power as an actor.   Lee J. Cobb also delivers a 
		gut-wrenching performance as Juror #3, the angry, emotionally wounded man who is convinced 
		the boy committed the murder. You can just feel the rage within him. He 
		is not accustomed to being 
		challenged, and he is infuriated that someone has the nerve to 
		stand up to his bullying tactics.  He does not like being opposed and he makes it 
		personal. Maybe he is just this way normally. Maybe he is just having a 
		bad day. Regardless, Cobb's performance is unforgettable.  The rest of the cast are an 
		all-star list of great Hollywood character actors. We've seen their faces  
		in numerous TV shows and films: Martin Balsam, Jack Klugman, Jack Warden, Robert Webber. This film is their time to shine, 
		too, 
		and they do.     Onto 
		No. 27... City of Brotherly Love and Cheesesteaks           
 |